Welcome, Guest |
You have to register before you can post on our site.
|
Forum Statistics |
» Members: 1,153
» Latest member: BAJR
» Forum threads: 4,060
» Forum posts: 4,408
Full Statistics
|
Online Users |
There are currently 239 online users. » 0 Member(s) | 239 Guest(s)
|
Latest Threads |
cIFA does it again (or ra...
Forum: The Site Hut
Last Post: BAJR
14th November 2017, 09:14 AM
» Replies: 4
» Views: 13,300
|
Genetic analysis of old b...
Forum: The Site Hut
Last Post: Marc Berger
30th August 2017, 10:32 AM
» Replies: 5
» Views: 10,219
|
What would eh know about ...
Forum: The Site Hut
Last Post: Marc Berger
15th July 2017, 01:37 PM
» Replies: 15
» Views: 19,989
|
How can adequate developm...
Forum: The Site Hut
Last Post: Dinosaur
10th July 2017, 12:20 PM
» Replies: 2
» Views: 6,306
|
300,000 years ...Wow!
Forum: The Site Hut
Last Post: GnomeKing
7th June 2017, 09:52 PM
» Replies: 0
» Views: 3,670
|
Is it an Arched trench or...
Forum: The Site Hut
Last Post: GnomeKing
25th May 2017, 05:44 PM
» Replies: 43
» Views: 46,539
|
Three Word Days
Forum: The Site Hut
Last Post: BAJR
25th May 2017, 01:06 PM
» Replies: 598
» Views: 300,182
|
myfile
Forum: The Site Hut
Last Post: Marc Berger
12th April 2017, 09:52 PM
» Replies: 8
» Views: 11,560
|
Recover your password
Forum: The Site Hut
Last Post: Wax
10th April 2017, 09:54 PM
» Replies: 5
» Views: 27,776
|
International Heritage Vi...
Forum: The Site Hut
Last Post: BAJR
31st March 2017, 10:29 AM
» Replies: 0
» Views: 3,707
|
|
|
the times they are a-changing |
Posted by: littleyellowidol - 7th July 2005, 04:29 PM - Forum: The Site Hut
- Replies (24)
|
|
Greetings
Something unnerving is happening in archaeology. I've worked on several sites recently where I've spent at least a couple of weeks being the only smoker. Also, I was working on a site recently which had one smoker, one vegetarian and one Guardian reader. What the devil is going on? Has anyone else noticed this development?
On a related note, I don't drink any more these days. Are there any other teetotal diggers out there?
Peace,
lyi.
|
|
|
shocked + disappointed |
Posted by: medi-evil - 6th July 2005, 07:35 PM - Forum: The Site Hut
- Replies (19)
|
|
...to see the metal detecting thread locked and sea-surgion banned, I was watching that with interest. that guy was a bit abrasive but articulate and insicive. he countered everything u thrrew at him, u were on the ropes, folk were starting to agree with him, u couldnt answer valid points, your pet project gets a bit of stick, so you ban the guy, WELL DONE. considering the minute number of people who look at this board there was no need for that, and troll, brave words AFTER the guy has been banned. what happened to free speech? all this from a forum called bajr baiting, named after a disgusting bloodsport, "hello pot, its kettle here."
|
|
|
two references |
Posted by: Troll - 5th July 2005, 10:20 PM - Forum: The Site Hut
- Replies (19)
|
|
What on earth is this new trend about? Plenty of empoyers are asking for two references now. I was offered a job when I was already in the field with another unit. How am I supposed to sort two references out when on the circuit? What sort of employer regards references as a guaruntee anyway? Does`nt an archaeologists c.v say it all anyway? Since when do employers need references when they`re only offering temporary/casual contracts? Surely, if a new employee is a dick, references will not reflect this-totally the opposite probably. You only know you have employed a dick when you`ve worked with them. Thatcher and Blair no doubt had exquisite references....On another related issue...what does "degree or equivalent" mean? Are we so awash with willing workers that potential employers can make up the rules as they go along? I would`nt dare ask my boss for a reference-far too much to do and my c.v has all the data a potntial employer needs. What next? Three stage interviews for a weeks work? c`mon.....
|
|
|
TV Terrors |
Posted by: trowelhead - 5th July 2005, 09:43 AM - Forum: The Site Hut
- Replies (23)
|
|
I would be interested to know which, if any, archaeology shows you guys out there rate. I remember 10 years or so ago the Time Team was quite good and the excavations non sensationalist and what you saw is what you got, if they found nothing then that was the way it went in archaeology. Are you a Meet the Ancestors type or a 2 Men in a Trench type (sky) or are you higher brow a Timewatch or Horizon Fan perchance. Indeed do the beeb make any more of an impartial job of it. But please, please, please keep it to your selves if you were into the great Satan of archaeological TV that was??.. I can hardly bring myself to say it but here goes ?Extreme Archaeology? Aahhh god said! Sorry that was too much I gotta go and Vom![xx(]
|
|
|
BIG DIG |
Posted by: BAJR Host - 3rd July 2005, 08:58 PM - Forum: The Site Hut
- Replies (34)
|
|
I can't take it any more...
what are peoples thoughts?
Is it a big Dig or a Bag of S##t?
Are you on a site...?
It it good, bad or totally Tony?[?]
Another day another WSI?
|
|
|
|