The following warnings occurred: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Warning [2] Undefined array key "avatartype" - Line: 783 - File: global.php PHP 8.0.30 (Linux)
|
Draft Heritage Protection Bill - Printable Version +- BAJR Federation Archaeology (http://www.bajrfed.co.uk) +-- Forum: BAJR Federation Forums (http://www.bajrfed.co.uk/forumdisplay.php?fid=3) +--- Forum: The Site Hut (http://www.bajrfed.co.uk/forumdisplay.php?fid=7) +--- Thread: Draft Heritage Protection Bill (/showthread.php?tid=899) |
Draft Heritage Protection Bill - BAJR Host - 2nd April 2008 Draft Heritage Protection Bill has been published today on the DCMS website and can be viewed on their website: http://www.culture.gov.uk/Reference_library/Publications/archive_2008/pub_drafthpb.htm Minister Andy Burnham says: "Heritage protection is as important as anything else we do in this Department. But nobody can sit in an office in London and decide what is heritage or not. Local communities have strong feelings about their own heritage and it is important that those voices are heard. "By unifying the protection regimes, encouraging wider participation, and making the system more transparent we aim to make heritage protection easier to understand and manage, and help it become an integral part of public life. "The draft Bill we are publishing today follows long and extensive consultation. It reflects Government policy as expressed in last year's White Paper, and the consensus reached on that. But it is not the last word, because consultation goes on. That's why we're publishing it in draft. "We welcome the widest possible debate and, if there are proposals for further changes, we will consider them carefully in the light of all the views expressed. I am grateful for the time and trouble that so many organisations and individuals have taken getting us to this point." Comments anyone? "No job worth doing was ever done on time or under budget.." Khufu Draft Heritage Protection Bill - m300572 - 2nd April 2008 208 pages - you'll not get many comments in a hurry! Draft Heritage Protection Bill - Curator Kid - 2nd April 2008 And an additional 76 pages of Impact Assessment to go with it! Zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz! Draft Heritage Protection Bill - BAJR Host - 2nd April 2008 well you did not think Iw as going to read it didya!! "No job worth doing was ever done on time or under budget.." Khufu Draft Heritage Protection Bill - historic building - 3rd April 2008 Has anyone, who may be trying to read this, noticed any references to local lists (or registering) for local people? Draft Heritage Protection Bill - Weegie - 3rd April 2008 Are you thinking of something other than HERs? Draft Heritage Protection Bill - historic building - 3rd April 2008 Well one of the boroughs I deal with is effectively looking for a sop to pass onto a small town which is likely to be very 'regererated' over the next few years. There is great public pressure for a central conservation area, but the borough is unwilling to provide this as it would put in that bit more work for applications - it is that kind of place. They have been looking to locally list buildings as a way of offering something to the lovely general public which will not have the effect of a conservation area. In the previous (was it a green paper?) paper there were references to applying article 4 directions to local lists. I am just wondering if this made it into the bill. Draft Heritage Protection Bill - Winders - 3rd April 2008 Have you tried the powers that county councils also have to declare conservation areas? I'm fairly certain that all that would be required for making demolition and partial demolition development and therefore under the control of Article 4 directions would not require a new government act and all it would take is yet another amendment of the GPDO. I recall seeing something about local lists in the section on HERs- once I get to that part of the document again I'll post in more detail. Draft Heritage Protection Bill - Weegie - 3rd April 2008 There is a reference to local lists in clause 215 (para 25:face-thinks:, but I'm not sure that this covers your point. Draft Heritage Protection Bill - Winders - 3rd April 2008 Para 212 states that local lists must be in the HER. 215 seems to state that LPAs must have a published criteria of local listing. I imagine that once the HPA is passed and enacted, the GPDO will be amended to provide protection of assets on the local list. |