The following warnings occurred: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Warning [2] Undefined array key "avatartype" - Line: 783 - File: global.php PHP 8.3.17 (Linux)
|
![]() |
Watch your Stakeholders! - Printable Version +- BAJR Federation Archaeology (http://www.bajrfed.co.uk) +-- Forum: BAJR Federation Forums (http://www.bajrfed.co.uk/forumdisplay.php?fid=3) +--- Forum: The Site Hut (http://www.bajrfed.co.uk/forumdisplay.php?fid=7) +--- Thread: Watch your Stakeholders! (/showthread.php?tid=1480) |
Watch your Stakeholders! - Wibblehead - 25th March 2009 Also how do i write about a topographic survey without using benchmark?! :face-huh: 'that pointy thing with the line wot you finds on the sides of buildings, usually under the render that the kind owner has thoughtfully plastered everywhere' :face-approve: ~~~~~ Thunder rolled. ... It rolled a six. Watch your Stakeholders! - gorilla - 25th March 2009 Furthermore... how can HERs carry on with the Historic Environment Records: Benchmarks for Good Practice - Consultation Paper, when the word 'benchmark' is now banned? "I hope one day chickens will be able to cross the road without having their motives questioned" Anon Watch your Stakeholders! - chiz - 25th March 2009 Quote:quote:Originally posted by BAJR Host knew they'd get out of the pay benchmarking somehow ![]() Watch your Stakeholders! - Oxbeast - 25th March 2009 Maybe you could use 'comparison' instead. Watch your Stakeholders! - voice of reason - 25th March 2009 How about just replacing "in partnership" simply with "with" "community heritage engagement" project with "local archaeological project" "community engagement" with "participation"? Can we ban "Historic Environment Professional" as well while we are at it? Watch your Stakeholders! - Dirty Dave Lincoln - 25th March 2009 Banning words and phrases? when people start being told what they can and cannot say then we are on a very slippery slope!! Watch your Stakeholders! - Wibblehead - 25th March 2009 [:I] hope noone thought my suggestions were serious the best thing is to just get on with it. if its the most appropriate word for the situation then there shouldn't be a problem. Besides, someone will always take issue no matter how carefully you phrase things. Tis the way of things. ~~~~~ Thunder rolled. ... It rolled a six. Watch your Stakeholders! - BAJR Host - 25th March 2009 damn right VoR...! lets keep it simple.. we should have a decoder service on bajr... as to banning s I don't think good in the what . ?When a sinister person means to be your enemy, they always start by trying to become your friend.? William Blake Watch your Stakeholders! - Austin Ainsworth - 25th March 2009 Quote:quote:Originally posted by voice of reasonFor me 'in partnership' stays as it implies that both parties are of equal standing in the project. 'community heritage engagement' also stays as not all heritage projects are archaeological and if 'Historic Environment Professional' goes then so does my job as an Historic Environment Assistant. Sometimes, there's a tendency by some to assume that heritage is nothing but archaeology, for some of us archaeology is only part of our job description and Historic Environment Professional is a better, much more descriptive,label to hang on us than one which only describes a fraction of what we do. So - no to all those suggestions. ![]() Watch your Stakeholders! - Fishslice - 26th March 2009 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EpeqPdVyQd0 [video]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EpeqPdVyQd0[/video] |