The following warnings occurred: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Warning [2] Undefined array key "avatartype" - Line: 783 - File: global.php PHP 8.0.30 (Linux)
|
PPS15 Draft Consultation - Printable Version +- BAJR Federation Archaeology (http://www.bajrfed.co.uk) +-- Forum: BAJR Federation Forums (http://www.bajrfed.co.uk/forumdisplay.php?fid=3) +--- Forum: The Site Hut (http://www.bajrfed.co.uk/forumdisplay.php?fid=7) +--- Thread: PPS15 Draft Consultation (/showthread.php?tid=2288) |
PPS15 Draft Consultation - BAJR Host - 4th September 2009 I do love grabbing the wrong end, because often it is more interesting. Measuring the known (which is what you describe is easy-ish) measuring the unknown in a planning concept.. nw thats more interesting. I would love to see exactly how these measurements are done.. and how exactly they will be implemented in PPS. rather than a vague concept and mumble, which is all I see in (for example) this Policy HE6: Monitoring indicators. All I want to know is where is the docuemnt to back this one up. I am the same with Setting issues... I can't say too much, however I recently had this (alleged) conversation. "the setting is significant" "how did you work out the setting" "we have still to decide" "so why is it significant" " please take part in a consultation" "about what?" "how to work out setting value" "so how can you work out the setting is significant?" "we have decided" "what? "that is is significant based on the setting criteria" "what criteria?" "we have still to decide" AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAArg xx( xx( So where can I find these performance indicator criteria... then I will be happy PPS15 Draft Consultation - vulpes - 11th September 2009 I feel that I have explained the PIs bit enough in the previous post. Read the practice guide and show some imagination! On the issue of setting EH indicate in the practice guide that they are soon to publish guidance (finally) on this. PPS15 Draft Consultation - BAJR Host - 11th September 2009 I read and showed imagination. I also prefer to explain things. Vulpes Wrote:The PPS is suggesting that Local Authorities should in future seek to further engage with this process by (as far as possible) giving and indication of the condition (and sometimes loss) of non-nationally designated heritage assets Does not explain - but rather expects prior understanding. This forum is one for people to read and learn, as well as be a discussion. :face-confused: So for example...non-nationally designated heritage assets does that mean anything not a SAM or Listed? indication of the condition in what respect? indication compared to what condition? seek to further engage love it... a fab bit of govt. speak. this process what process? So you see what I want to see is some clear speaking english language useful comment so people can understand whats going on. A simple web link or a document reference for example. (though in the main these are just as vague) The setting one does make me chuckle .. and HS are supposed to be putting out a consultation document in August to look at it as well (ooops its September!) Always tricky trying to quantify the subjective. PPS15 Draft Consultation - Austin Ainsworth - 11th September 2009 Consultation is ongoing with the new PPS - should there be a BAJR Fed response? PPS15 Draft Consultation - BAJR Host - 11th September 2009 Perhaps there should be. So ... can we set up an area. PPS15 Draft Consultation - Austin Ainsworth - 11th September 2009 I think we should, time is limited so if the Fed is going to make a submission it needs to be soon. PPS15 Draft Consultation - BAJR Host - 11th September 2009 http://www.communities.gov.uk/publications/planningandbuilding/consultationhistoricpps To catch up on the previous discussion: From Kevin Austin Wrote:There are many things to like about the document. It is good that HERs appear to gain mandatory status (although the caveat that authorities dont need to maintain an HER merely have access to one seems a little odd); it is also good that every planning authority should engage an archaeological advisor (although these can be consultancy rather than 'in-house' posts). From Oxbeast Austin Wrote:The architects and builders trade press is expressing concern over the new PPS, claiming that the definition of 'heritage assets' is too open. I'd like to see them some up with a definition of 'development' which covers all possible examples. From Paul Belford: Austin Wrote:English Heritage is holding a series of events exploring the consultation draft. The events will provide delegates with background on the process of developing the PPS, and afford opportunities for discussion about its principles, content, and the supporting Practice Guide. PPS15 Draft Consultation - gilescarey - 12th September 2009 Might be of interest... http://www.cgms.co.uk/bulletin/pps15.pdf PPS15 Draft Consultation - vulpes - 12th September 2009 Funny I thought a forum was somewhere to express opinions. I didn't realise that my role in this discussion was to walk you through the PPS line by line. My mistake. PPS15 Draft Consultation - BAJR Host - 12th September 2009 Thank you for you help... Imagine me thinking that A Forum was where people were polite and helpful My Mistake :face-kiss: Guess that means you don't have a real answer then Thanks Knap. that was indeed useful. Am sitting down after a hard day finding chapels... and reading up more. |