The following warnings occurred: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Warning [2] Undefined array key "avatartype" - Line: 783 - File: global.php PHP 8.0.30 (Linux)
|
Cross-sector approach to capitalise on archaeology in Scotland - Printable Version +- BAJR Federation Archaeology (http://www.bajrfed.co.uk) +-- Forum: BAJR Federation Forums (http://www.bajrfed.co.uk/forumdisplay.php?fid=3) +--- Forum: The Site Hut (http://www.bajrfed.co.uk/forumdisplay.php?fid=7) +--- Thread: Cross-sector approach to capitalise on archaeology in Scotland (/showthread.php?tid=4406) Pages:
1
2
|
Cross-sector approach to capitalise on archaeology in Scotland - kevin wooldridge - 5th April 2012 I think that BAJR has inadvertently invented a new method of cutting through archaeological bullshit. Step 1: Write your review/report/draft document. Step 2: Send a draft to BAJR. Step 3: Allow Unit of 1 free rein to read and comment on document. Step 4: If Uo1's comments make more sense than the original document......... ...back to the drawing board!! Well done Uo1....I was thinking that it was just me who thought this report, although probably well intended, appeared to be written by a committee of Sir Humphreys..... Cross-sector approach to capitalise on archaeology in Scotland - Dinosaur - 5th April 2012 This mean we'll be able to spot Scottish sites on the Time Team without turning the sound up, cos Fil 'Ardin will be kitted out in tartan overalls and walking a bit strangely? Can't wait :face-approve: Cross-sector approach to capitalise on archaeology in Scotland - Unitof1 - 3rd May 2012 The recomendations were so good they decided to write them out twice http://www.historic-scotland.gov.uk/archaeology-review-2012.pdf who ever gets this job will know what they are talking about http://applications.historic-scotland.gov.uk/pages/job_search_view.aspx?jobId=622&JobIndex=1&categoryList=&location=-1&workingPatternList=&keywords=archaeology&PageIndex=1&Number=1 8.7 Finally, the Review revisits its Recommendations. Now thats what I call REvisionist. |