The following warnings occurred: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Warning [2] Undefined array key "avatartype" - Line: 783 - File: global.php PHP 8.0.30 (Linux)
|
Whats in their briefs? - Printable Version +- BAJR Federation Archaeology (http://www.bajrfed.co.uk) +-- Forum: BAJR Federation Forums (http://www.bajrfed.co.uk/forumdisplay.php?fid=3) +--- Forum: The Site Hut (http://www.bajrfed.co.uk/forumdisplay.php?fid=7) +--- Thread: Whats in their briefs? (/showthread.php?tid=5829) |
Whats in their briefs? - BAJR - 6th April 2016 In which case... my suggestion is you ask teh people whose standards your are quoting. given I did not write them, it would be inappropriate to comment - Here is the CIfA website contacts page: http://www.archaeologists.net/contact Whats in their briefs? - Marc Berger - 7th April 2016 Can I upload the emails here? Whats in their briefs? - BAJR - 7th April 2016 If you ask them first and they agree to the knowledge that the replies would be on a public BAJR Forum/ Whats in their briefs? - Marc Berger - 7th April 2016 These are the last few months emails trying to get an answer on this subject. Whats in their briefs? - Marc Berger - 8th April 2016 all we are saying hosty is that every brief issued in England and Wales should say Quote:In England, Wales, Northern Ireland and the Isle of Man ownership of objects rests with I already make this very clear to the landowners who owns the objects, I don't think that I could make it any more clearer. It should have been, from the inception, the planning archaeologists' "must make". Whats in their briefs? - BAJR - 8th April 2016 AS we discussed... as long as the landowner is aware then no harm done... you can rest easy knowing justice has been served... and get on with the job. phew Whats in their briefs? - Marc Berger - 8th April 2016 Hosty as Prentice has said this is about discharge of conditions, unlawful development Quote:lpa briefs .. in fact is worded to imply that objects have to be deposited in a museum or planning conditions will not be discharged Whats in their briefs? - Marc Berger - 8th April 2016 There is also the possibility that because of NPPF moving archaeology pre application that briefs are no longer being produced because there is no one to pay for them Whats in their briefs? - Marc Berger - 8th April 2016 This what it says in Lincolnshire Quote:1.12 Archive depositionMy underlining Whats in their briefs? - P Prentice - 8th April 2016 1.12 Archive deposition The integrity of the site archive should be maintained. but sometime cant All finds and records should preferably be properly curated by a single organisation, but sometimes cant and be available for public consultation but sometimes cant. The archive should be deposited within six months of the completed project or prior to the request for discharge of any relevant planning condition. Under NPPF planning conditions should not normally be discharged until archiving is complete. The archive consists of all written records not necessarily and materials recovered not necessarily, drawn and photographic records, including a single copy of the final report. It will be quantified, ordered, indexed and internally consistent. It should also contain site matrices ha ha, a site summary and brief written observations on the artefactual and environmental data. An accession number must be drawn prior to the commencement of archaeological works. but not necessarily An expected archive deposition date should also be included very funny, this should be applied for at the same time as the museum accession code and site code. This is a compulsory requirement for the specification but not really enforceable in law. |