The following warnings occurred: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Warning [2] Undefined array key "avatartype" - Line: 783 - File: global.php PHP 8.0.30 (Linux)
|
Is it an Arched trench or a very smelly wet church. Blame the Aussies - Printable Version +- BAJR Federation Archaeology (http://www.bajrfed.co.uk) +-- Forum: BAJR Federation Forums (http://www.bajrfed.co.uk/forumdisplay.php?fid=3) +--- Forum: The Site Hut (http://www.bajrfed.co.uk/forumdisplay.php?fid=7) +--- Thread: Is it an Arched trench or a very smelly wet church. Blame the Aussies (/showthread.php?tid=5321) |
Is it an Arched trench or a very smelly wet church. Blame the Aussies - Marc Berger - 13th June 2016 Hosty I email the tender people they are very open about it still not being available. Last Week they said somebody was going off the see Oxford and find out what was happening. Is it an Arched trench or a very smelly wet church. Blame the Aussies - Marc Berger - 12th September 2016 On Fri, 10/6/16, xxxxxxx@HistoricEngland.org.uk> wrote: Subject: Assessing the impact of trench arch drainage systems on archaeological remains in churchyards PN 7063 To: "MARC BERGER" Cc: "xxxxxxxx" xxxxxx@HistoricEngland.org.uk> Date: Friday, 10 June, 2016, 11:36 Dear Marc, This project is not yet completed, our Historic England Project Assurance Officer will meet with Oxford next week so we will hear more about progress then. I will not be working in the team from Tuesday so I have copied xxxxxxxx in who will be able to help you in the future. All the best, xxxxxx. vvxvxvx Procurement Manager xxxx@historicengland.org.uk Is it an Arched trench or a very smelly wet church. Blame the Aussies - Dinosaur - 13th September 2016 Sounds like you've been palmed-off onto another unsuspecting... } Is it an Arched trench or a very smelly wet church. Blame the Aussies - Marc Berger - 4th October 2016 XXXXX,XXXXXX<XXXXX.XXXX@HistoricEngland.org.uk> 13 Sep at 3:04 PM To MARK BURGER Message body Hi Mark Thank you for your email. The final version of the report is not available as yet I am afraid. We anticipate that it should be going up on the website within the next month or so. My advice would be to check on the website over the coming weeks. Thankyou XXX XXXXXX.XXXXX Business Support Officer - Commissions Research Group Historic England Room 3/60 The Engine House Fire Fly Avenue Swindon SN2 2EH Direct Dial: xxxxxxx or Mobile: xxxxxxxx Is it an Arched trench or a very smelly wet church. Blame the Aussies - Dinosaur - 5th October 2016 At least they're consistent :face-approve: Is it an Arched trench or a very smelly wet church. Blame the Aussies - Marc Berger - 7th October 2016 slippier than an eel but nice to see that people have less shame than me and I look up at snakes bellies. Is it an Arched trench or a very smelly wet church. Blame the Aussies - Marc Berger - 2nd December 2016 https://library.thehumanjourney.net/87/1/KIRTMV08.pdf yes folks this is a watching brief in a church yard. At what point would you have said that the watching brief was over and that you did not have resources or contingency to excavate the site fully and so make the cheap trench arch option more like the end of the Church of England's pension fund? Some quiz questions on Oxfords report: Question 1: Figure 4: Sections 1 and 2, where is figure 1 in the plans? Question 2: Figure 4: Sections 1 and 2 how deep were the sections? Question 3: After you pour raw human sewage into the trench what immediate effect will there be on the archaeology? Question 4: In table 1 does "Completeness" and "Condition" relate to the whole skeleton? Question 5: What are charnel deposits? Question 6: How many Skeletons were encountered in this watching brief? Question 7: Would a unit that considers the excavation of any skeleton in a watching brief adequate by breaking the bones off at the baulk when financially employed by an organisation that has control over its own planning permissions and that is flogging "trench Arch" as the cheapest option, to be an unbiased unit to produce this report?: https://historicengland.org.uk/images-books/publications/assessing-impact-of-trench-arch-drainage-systems-on-archaeological-remains-in-churchyards/ Is it an Arched trench or a very smelly wet church. Blame the Aussies - Marc Berger - 15th December 2016 And now the government / Environment agency have approved Trench Arch: https://www.gov.uk/permits-you-need-for-septic-tanks/overview Is it an Arched trench or a very smelly wet church. Blame the Aussies - Marc Berger - 28th January 2017 Current state of pooing on skellies with an occasional watching brief Quote:Dear Mr Berger, Not a single trench arch has remained above 0.5m, not a single "assessment" exists, not a single trench arch has had an archaeological field Evaluation, all the trench arches described in the report were "non" standard (is it because there is no standard). What has archaeology got to do with the long-term sustainability of the churches? Not a single affordable house for a small family would be allowed to have this pile of poo system in its garden. Just what laws of drainage can move poo thirty metres keeping within a depth of 0.5 metres (which in the report is said should be 400mm). Just where do you find this type of slope in a church yard ........ Is it an Arched trench or a very smelly wet church. Blame the Aussies - Marc Berger - 1st March 2017 The trench arc contamination spreads to being a mitigation stratergy Would anybody know how much the church paid for the archaeology work done at St Mary the Virgin, Oxfordshire? |