The following warnings occurred: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Warning [2] Undefined array key "avatartype" - Line: 783 - File: global.php PHP 8.0.30 (Linux)
|
Scanning Slides - Printable Version +- BAJR Federation Archaeology (http://www.bajrfed.co.uk) +-- Forum: BAJR Federation Forums (http://www.bajrfed.co.uk/forumdisplay.php?fid=3) +--- Forum: The Site Hut (http://www.bajrfed.co.uk/forumdisplay.php?fid=7) +--- Thread: Scanning Slides (/showthread.php?tid=1143) |
Scanning Slides - BAJR Host - 13th October 2008 :face-huh: someone is asking about scanning slides (around 300 of them) anyone know about professional group that they have used and trust? I know that slide scanning can be a hit and miss... given a small bit of dust.. or a grainy image ... whats the thought? "I don't have an archaeological imagination.." Borekickers Scanning Slides - kevin wooldridge - 13th October 2008 I looked into this a while back cos' like everyone else I guess I have a load of slides and thought they would be better if made digital. I discovered a firm who would do the work for about 50p per slide (so was looking at an investment of circa £500 plus postage and packing, which rather put me off. However I then looked at getting a scanner and doing it myself and discovered that Hewlett Packard do a scanner with special slide adaptor and very high resolution results for about £200 quid. So that would seem to be a cheaper option if one has the time and patience. But having done it, what further use would I have for the scanner..... At present (and I guess also like many other folk with big slide collections) I am thinking about which option might be the better choice..... |