The following warnings occurred: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Warning [2] Undefined array key "avatartype" - Line: 783 - File: global.php PHP 8.0.30 (Linux)
|
Contravercial Port Enlargement seeks archaeological Work - Printable Version +- BAJR Federation Archaeology (http://www.bajrfed.co.uk) +-- Forum: BAJR Federation Forums (http://www.bajrfed.co.uk/forumdisplay.php?fid=3) +--- Forum: The Site Hut (http://www.bajrfed.co.uk/forumdisplay.php?fid=7) +--- Thread: Contravercial Port Enlargement seeks archaeological Work (/showthread.php?tid=2503) |
Contravercial Port Enlargement seeks archaeological Work - BAJR Host - 10th January 2010 Well this is one to rival the famous TaraWatch controversy... here is the one to watch for 2010. Contract for the provision of archaeological and cultural heritage services to Bremore Ireland Port Limited in connection with a new greenfield port at Bremore, Co. Dublin. http://www.etenders.gov.ie/search/show/search_view.aspx?ID=NOV134816 [ATTACH=CONFIG]125[/ATTACH]So who is it going to be?? and who will be able to shrug off the criticism that will follow. Like Tara.. it is too easy to listen to one side and not have the full picture. Lets hope that whoever does get it, deals with it in teh same way as they did at Thornborough... open, transparent and showing what can be gained... this could be seen as an opportunity.. (to see other pictures of the area... go here: http://www.panoramio.com/user/743400 here is some info from Wiki: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bremore_Port To get the opposing view (and I have often reported these in the weekly podcast) her is a news report: http://www.drogheda-independent.ie/news/bremore-group-begin-battle-to-save-historic-site-1986384.html |