The following warnings occurred: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Warning [2] Undefined array key "avatartype" - Line: 783 - File: global.php PHP 8.0.30 (Linux)
|
IfA campaign for historic environment services ? - Printable Version +- BAJR Federation Archaeology (http://www.bajrfed.co.uk) +-- Forum: BAJR Federation Forums (http://www.bajrfed.co.uk/forumdisplay.php?fid=3) +--- Forum: The Site Hut (http://www.bajrfed.co.uk/forumdisplay.php?fid=7) +--- Thread: IfA campaign for historic environment services ? (/showthread.php?tid=3714) |
IfA campaign for historic environment services ? - BAJR - 28th January 2011 IfA campaigns against threats to local authority historic environment services Quote: At its meeting on 10 December 2010, IfA Executive committee agreed that the greatest threat to archaeology and the historic environment comes from cuts to local authority historic environment services. These services are responsible for identifying heritage assets that may be affected by development, for requiring planning applicants to provide the information necessary to make an informed decision, and for ensuring that the applicant takes the necessary steps to mitigate or offset the environmental harm caused by the proposed development, in accordance with government planning policy. Crucially, local government archaeologists deal with undesignated assets – the important and significant parts of our heritage that make up 95% of the whole. While PPS5 in England sets out clear guidance on a local authority’s responsibilities and represents a unique opportunity for significant improvements in practice, it and its longer-established counterparts elsewhere in the UK depend on the retention of expert professional staff for their effective application.A worthy cause indeed... and with our full backing, however, has it worked? has anything been saved. One only has to look at Scotland, and the resounding 'success' of the HE amendment bill. To quote Peter Hinton Peter Hinton, IfA Chief Executive commented: “The IfA welcomes the passage of the Bill as a positive step forward in strengthening the ability to effectively and sustainably manage Scotland’s historic environment. However, although it addresses some loopholes in protection it is regrettable that more fundamental reforms were not included, for example the introduction of a statutory responsibility on local authorities to have access to expert historic environment advice. It can only be hoped that the Scottish Government will take note of those MSPs in the debate who reflected the views of the sector by calling for wider-reaching reform”. http://www.archaeologists.net/news/110125-approval-historic-environment-amendment-scotland-bill So... er... failure to force statutory responsibility for expert historic environment advice :0 = Success? (after all, this is what underpins the whole system - take it away and everything else goes) Not to mention a storm cloud looking over Scottish Heritage bodies in general and we look to PPS5 as the great saviour of England and Wales .... while real job cuts and council reorganisation is happening now... there may not be much left to save... SO the question. is... no flim flam, no great words... no hope for the future... but what is real solid success... Any real jobs saved? And statutory requirements added? anything that is solid... Or is archaeology (sorry Historic Environment) taken as seriously as a comedy monkey in flippers ? :o) IfA campaign for historic environment services ? - troll - 28th January 2011 Apologies for the short reply but........either the UK on the whole are signatories to internationally agreed conventions or they are not. Nowhere have I read that obligations on the part of National or Local Government have been withdrawn or altered. And whilst laudable-since when is it the mandate of a non-statutory body to remind a statutory body of its statutory obligations?:face-approve: IfA campaign for historic environment services ? - Wax - 28th January 2011 So what are the consequence to the statutory body if it does not meet its statutory obligations? If there are no consequences (or rather consequences that are serious to the offenders) then there is no incentive :face-crying: IfA campaign for historic environment services ? - troll - 30th January 2011 Just to clarify my post a bit..... If a non-statutory body is lobbying and reminding LGA`s of their obligations, then all well and good. My point (poorly made) was that the approach should be through appropriate complaints procedures, the Local Government Ombudsman and ultimately, National and European Courts. As cuts instituted by central Government would be seen as the catalyst for an LGA`s inability to comply with its obligations, it follows then that central Government is in clear breach. |