The following warnings occurred: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Warning [2] Undefined array key "avatartype" - Line: 783 - File: global.php PHP 8.0.30 (Linux)
|
Alfred the Great - Printable Version +- BAJR Federation Archaeology (http://www.bajrfed.co.uk) +-- Forum: BAJR Federation Forums (http://www.bajrfed.co.uk/forumdisplay.php?fid=3) +--- Forum: The Site Hut (http://www.bajrfed.co.uk/forumdisplay.php?fid=7) +--- Thread: Alfred the Great (/showthread.php?tid=5207) |
Alfred the Great - Dirty Boy - 18th January 2014 Read this last night, and looking forward (or not) to seeing the show on Tuesday for a lengthier explanation? http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-hampshire-25760383 To be fair, reading this made me quite cross (could have been the wine on the train!). I feel it's very much not akin to archaeology and more to disturbing/looting corpses at best because we're a bit interested, or at worst for media acclaim. (I am always very uncomfortable when human remains are disturbed unless they're going to be destroyed otherwise). I'm going to watch said documentary first, as I expect the good doctor has been taken out of context, but when such weak conclusions are offered up to the media it does make me wonder, shock horror! whether archaeologists should be licensed. Or am I just being a bit sensitive? Answers on a postcard please... Alfred the Great - Dinosaur - 19th January 2014 All seems a bit weak? - but yes, wait for the tv prog Alfred the Great - BAJR - 21st January 2014 Can't wait... spurious or curious? |