1st December 2008, 11:53 PM
BAJR Host says: "Short Term...what do we do now!"
I reply: "I cannot suggest anything as a sure-solution. HOPE IT GETS BETTER AFTER CHRISTMAS?"
BAJR Host asks: "how do we turn into a real profession, with solid govt legislation to back it up?"
I reply: I cannot envisage vast changes to how things are (except lower tenders and shorter contracts), in this present "economic climate".
I recall a conversation with Dirty Dave (in our local pub).
I said something like:
"The problem is, Archaeology in the UK is a PROFESSION PERMANENTLY DIVIDED AGAINST ITSELF?
If they had organised it like the Civil Service, that is, there would be just one large unit per county, funded by government, then yes....you would get a more stable national archaeology career structure. The reality is, that government does not want to fund archaeology to a great degree so Privatisation came in.....so units forever tender against each other....hence they are DIVIDED against each other - economically, if not academically".
I still think that...and I cannot think how this situation could be radically changed?
My "fear" is that the government will somehow stimulate the Building Industry, to get out of the recession AND relax the amount of archaeology requirements (and less Newt and Badger inspections too?) just to speed the Building Industry on its way?
I hope not!
I shall end this reply with what seems to be fast-becoming my catch-phrase....
"HOPE IT GETS BETTER AFTER CHRISTMAS?"
I reply: "I cannot suggest anything as a sure-solution. HOPE IT GETS BETTER AFTER CHRISTMAS?"
BAJR Host asks: "how do we turn into a real profession, with solid govt legislation to back it up?"
I reply: I cannot envisage vast changes to how things are (except lower tenders and shorter contracts), in this present "economic climate".
I recall a conversation with Dirty Dave (in our local pub).
I said something like:
"The problem is, Archaeology in the UK is a PROFESSION PERMANENTLY DIVIDED AGAINST ITSELF?
If they had organised it like the Civil Service, that is, there would be just one large unit per county, funded by government, then yes....you would get a more stable national archaeology career structure. The reality is, that government does not want to fund archaeology to a great degree so Privatisation came in.....so units forever tender against each other....hence they are DIVIDED against each other - economically, if not academically".
I still think that...and I cannot think how this situation could be radically changed?
My "fear" is that the government will somehow stimulate the Building Industry, to get out of the recession AND relax the amount of archaeology requirements (and less Newt and Badger inspections too?) just to speed the Building Industry on its way?
I hope not!
I shall end this reply with what seems to be fast-becoming my catch-phrase....
"HOPE IT GETS BETTER AFTER CHRISTMAS?"