29th September 2009, 11:17 AM
Said here and elsewhere we have a serious discussion about another way to deal with payments for Treasure Trove
A finder receives 40% a landowner receives 40% and the rest is placed in a ringfenced pot (20%) to allow for call-out contracts on unexpected discoveries. No more running around looking for favours, no more hoping that some-one can find the cash to pay for an excavation and conservation - no more having to wait til the Monday.
Allowing the finder to be fully involved in the excavation as well.. not as a treat, but as a member of the team that further investigates.
Give it a thought...
after all, the number of times this would be required is small... and the number of lare cases where this would be required is smaller still..
hey you could even get away with 10% total. This would have to be regulated and used only for these cases, and only with the requirement for popular publication - using the staff hoard as a template (apart from the BBC giving away the location! numpties... which add pressure to the whole thing!)
SHould we ask?
A finder receives 40% a landowner receives 40% and the rest is placed in a ringfenced pot (20%) to allow for call-out contracts on unexpected discoveries. No more running around looking for favours, no more hoping that some-one can find the cash to pay for an excavation and conservation - no more having to wait til the Monday.
Allowing the finder to be fully involved in the excavation as well.. not as a treat, but as a member of the team that further investigates.
Give it a thought...
after all, the number of times this would be required is small... and the number of lare cases where this would be required is smaller still..
hey you could even get away with 10% total. This would have to be regulated and used only for these cases, and only with the requirement for popular publication - using the staff hoard as a template (apart from the BBC giving away the location! numpties... which add pressure to the whole thing!)
SHould we ask?
For really I think that the poorest he that is in England hath a life to live, as the greatest he
Thomas Rainborough 1647
Thomas Rainborough 1647