17th January 2007, 10:51 AM
Dear all,
I have just recieved the session programme and application form for the IFA conference 2007, and was aghast at the price. £130 pounds for the three days, not including the conference meal or accommodation (or transport). By my rough calculations it would cost me well over £200 to go to the event - even Glastonbury is cheaper!! How on earth do they expect field archaeologists, even up to P.O. level, to afford this? The conference is meant to be for field archaeologists, but few can afford to go. Is this a cunning way to keep pissed off and whinging diggers out of the conference, so the higher echelons can keep on pretending that all is fine and dandy?!:face-confused:
Although one loophole I may have noticed, that you have to be an IFA member to pay the £130, and as most field archaeologists are not MIFA, perhaps we don't need to pay the full whack after all?!
Any thoughts? Or am I being unreasonable?
the future's bright; the future's trowel shaped
I have just recieved the session programme and application form for the IFA conference 2007, and was aghast at the price. £130 pounds for the three days, not including the conference meal or accommodation (or transport). By my rough calculations it would cost me well over £200 to go to the event - even Glastonbury is cheaper!! How on earth do they expect field archaeologists, even up to P.O. level, to afford this? The conference is meant to be for field archaeologists, but few can afford to go. Is this a cunning way to keep pissed off and whinging diggers out of the conference, so the higher echelons can keep on pretending that all is fine and dandy?!:face-confused:
Although one loophole I may have noticed, that you have to be an IFA member to pay the £130, and as most field archaeologists are not MIFA, perhaps we don't need to pay the full whack after all?!
Any thoughts? Or am I being unreasonable?
the future's bright; the future's trowel shaped
the future\'s bright; the future\'s trowel shaped