3rd October 2011, 08:35 AM
For decades England's planning system has protected much loved places from harmful development -- and steered development to the places where it's needed.
If you care about preserving the places important to you, make your voice heard before October 12, 2011.
Watch the video and sign if you feel it is important.
https://www.planningforpeople.org.uk/
By protecting the planning system then you can strengthen the case for archaeology.
[video=youtube;8QMJKfbQ7fI]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8QMJKfbQ7fI[/video]
?Planning is for people, not for profit,? says Director-General, Dame Fiona Reynolds
The National Trust today signalled our grave concerns over the Government?s planning reforms, warning that the proposed changes could lead to unchecked and damaging development in the undesignated countryside on a scale not seen since the 1930s.
The draft of the National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF), published by the Government yesterday, contains a core presumption that the default answer to any proposed development will be ?yes?.
The Government?s proposals allow financial considerations to dominate, and with this comes huge risk to our countryside, historic environment and the precious local places that people value.'
We believe the tone and language of the NPPF and consultation document is wrong on several counts:
'The National Trust shares the Government?s commitment to localism but it has got the changes to planning wrong. We urge a rethink of the NPPF before we throw the baby out with the bathwater.'
If you care about preserving the places important to you, make your voice heard before October 12, 2011.
Watch the video and sign if you feel it is important.
https://www.planningforpeople.org.uk/
By protecting the planning system then you can strengthen the case for archaeology.
[video=youtube;8QMJKfbQ7fI]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8QMJKfbQ7fI[/video]
?Planning is for people, not for profit,? says Director-General, Dame Fiona Reynolds
The National Trust today signalled our grave concerns over the Government?s planning reforms, warning that the proposed changes could lead to unchecked and damaging development in the undesignated countryside on a scale not seen since the 1930s.
The draft of the National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF), published by the Government yesterday, contains a core presumption that the default answer to any proposed development will be ?yes?.
The Government?s proposals allow financial considerations to dominate, and with this comes huge risk to our countryside, historic environment and the precious local places that people value.'
We believe the tone and language of the NPPF and consultation document is wrong on several counts:
- the reversal of development controls in the public interest comes at too high a price. The NPPF?s concept of sustainable development puts too little weight on benefiting people and the environment
- the removal of much detailed guidance to local authorities leaves too much power in the hands of developers who will only need to show that their proposals will deliver growth for other important considerations ? for example impact on communities, nature and landscape, and the environment ? to be pushed aside.
- local people will have to rely on a development plan to protect what they treasure and shape where development should go. Yet only some local authorities have development plans in place and many local authorities and neighbourhood groups do not have the resources and specialist skills to create plans that genuinely integrate social, environmental and economic considerations. If there is no up to date development plan, planning applications will automatically get consent.
'The National Trust shares the Government?s commitment to localism but it has got the changes to planning wrong. We urge a rethink of the NPPF before we throw the baby out with the bathwater.'