Posts: 0
Threads: 0
Joined: Feb 2008
29th May 2013, 07:14 PM
(This post was last modified: 29th May 2013, 07:15 PM by Martin Locock.)
I should clarify that this standard deals with non-planning advice and does not address curatorial practice - this is aimed specifically at developer/contractor/consultant/subcontractor relationships.
On a side note I would share the view expressed here that soft curation does the profession, and the archaeology, no favours.
Posts: 1
Threads: 0
Joined: Jun 2005
Dinosaur Wrote:Curators refusing to sign off PCs occasionally might make a refreshing change?...ok, so any individual curator might only get to do it once...
You're probably right about the career limiting prospects of such a move, which is interesting because all conditions are legally binding, and many are considerably more expensive and time consuming for developers to comply with. In a month where at least one case of a
developer has been told to knock an entire development down because they failed to get the appropriate planning permission, maybe it's time for people to start taking discharge of conditions more seriously.
D. Vader
Senior Consultant
Vader Maull & Palpatine
Archaeological Consultants
A tremor in the Force. The last time I felt it was in the presence of Tony Robinson.
Posts: 1
Threads: 0
Joined: Apr 2010
Amen to that :face-approve:
Posts: 1
Threads: 0
Joined: Jan 2009
Damn straight. Goes for building and fire regs too!
