13th March 2009, 12:19 PM
I can answer that, as that is a question I had as well.
Basically, it is best to get a working system.. iron out glitches.. see what is wanted... then think about retrospective.. otherwise
a) you would cause info overload.. with data that you may have to go over a few times...
b) people would then be asked if thats ok.
It seems though that HERs are overloaded as it is.. the act of offering has been a great step, but perhaps, as HERs are mostly used for Develoment control, the best place for the records is where they are now... however, the offer is on the table.
A couple of Counties have stepped forward, and are suggesting ways it could work where everyone benefits... though (of course) it takes time.. I take my hat off to them.. This is about more information, and responsible detecting.. so everyone has to act accordingly, and perhaps stop fighting and start listening.. (not directed at anyone here i must add)
?When a sinister person means to be your enemy, they always start by trying to become your friend.?
William Blake
Basically, it is best to get a working system.. iron out glitches.. see what is wanted... then think about retrospective.. otherwise
a) you would cause info overload.. with data that you may have to go over a few times...
b) people would then be asked if thats ok.
It seems though that HERs are overloaded as it is.. the act of offering has been a great step, but perhaps, as HERs are mostly used for Develoment control, the best place for the records is where they are now... however, the offer is on the table.
A couple of Counties have stepped forward, and are suggesting ways it could work where everyone benefits... though (of course) it takes time.. I take my hat off to them.. This is about more information, and responsible detecting.. so everyone has to act accordingly, and perhaps stop fighting and start listening.. (not directed at anyone here i must add)
?When a sinister person means to be your enemy, they always start by trying to become your friend.?
William Blake