19th March 2009, 08:35 PM
..sorry for the slip up. In place of 'voted' read 'commented'
As for the opening hour. I made my post to point out that the main objector had LIED in his original letter that he posted here and distibuted to his students and collegues.
And I would re-iterate, it is highly likely that the majority of the objectors have no place to comment about noise issues as they have not attended a dog training class to hear it for themselves. Only then can their objections be taken seriously.
If noise is the issue then planning will be granted bescause it is simply...not an issue!
As for the opening hour. I made my post to point out that the main objector had LIED in his original letter that he posted here and distibuted to his students and collegues.
And I would re-iterate, it is highly likely that the majority of the objectors have no place to comment about noise issues as they have not attended a dog training class to hear it for themselves. Only then can their objections be taken seriously.
If noise is the issue then planning will be granted bescause it is simply...not an issue!