19th March 2009, 09:13 PM
Sorry to break ranks ....
defending the truth says
"it is highly likely that the majority of the objectors have no place to comment about noise issues as they have not attended a dog training class to hear it for themselves. Only then can their objections be taken seriously."
OK I take defending the truth point it re-iterates the point I made about measuring noise. I would note that the amount of noise at the dog training school is not relevant. What is relevant is the amount of noise at the Archaeological School and thus defending the truth is not is a position to comment. I have read all of the letters sent in many people who attend the field school say the barking is a problem.
I have worked on a number of dog related projects or where dog noise is a problem. Dog noise can be a major problem even at some distance. There is a simple process to follow in planning terms and simple measures that can be taken.
Peter
David I think we should lock this topic.
defending the truth says
"it is highly likely that the majority of the objectors have no place to comment about noise issues as they have not attended a dog training class to hear it for themselves. Only then can their objections be taken seriously."
OK I take defending the truth point it re-iterates the point I made about measuring noise. I would note that the amount of noise at the dog training school is not relevant. What is relevant is the amount of noise at the Archaeological School and thus defending the truth is not is a position to comment. I have read all of the letters sent in many people who attend the field school say the barking is a problem.
I have worked on a number of dog related projects or where dog noise is a problem. Dog noise can be a major problem even at some distance. There is a simple process to follow in planning terms and simple measures that can be taken.
Peter
David I think we should lock this topic.