25th March 2009, 04:54 PM
Quote:quote:Originally posted by voice of reasonFor me 'in partnership' stays as it implies that both parties are of equal standing in the project.
How about just replacing
"in partnership" simply with "with"
"community heritage engagement" project with "local archaeological project"
"community engagement" with "participation"?
Can we ban "Historic Environment Professional" as well while we are at it?
'community heritage engagement' also stays as not all heritage projects are archaeological
and if 'Historic Environment Professional' goes then so does my job as an Historic Environment Assistant.
Sometimes, there's a tendency by some to assume that heritage is nothing but archaeology, for some of us archaeology is only part of our job description and Historic Environment Professional is a better, much more descriptive,label to hang on us than one which only describes a fraction of what we do.
So - no to all those suggestions.