20th April 2009, 04:54 PM
Beamo read what peteraf posted, that is essentially it, plus some evidence that you have carried out similar work in the past. Unless it is a very small job and then maybe evidence that you have supervised similar work for another company.
What would you prefer, a line that says 'anyone at all can carry out the work'. Maybe even the builder and his ground workers, is that a better system for you? Or maybe someone in the local community who has seen time team?
It is easy to poke holes but much harder to suggest a better system. I await with eager interest your solution.
There are too many problems with the IFA to insist that people pay good money to join but that doesn?t mean we should allow just anyone to carry out the work. There is more to successfully recording and archiving a site than just writing a few essays you know. We have a responsibility, as we are requiring the developer to pay for the work and allowing the destruction of finite archaeological deposits, to see that it is carried out to an acceptable standard.
ten years on and still no bottom
What would you prefer, a line that says 'anyone at all can carry out the work'. Maybe even the builder and his ground workers, is that a better system for you? Or maybe someone in the local community who has seen time team?
It is easy to poke holes but much harder to suggest a better system. I await with eager interest your solution.
There are too many problems with the IFA to insist that people pay good money to join but that doesn?t mean we should allow just anyone to carry out the work. There is more to successfully recording and archiving a site than just writing a few essays you know. We have a responsibility, as we are requiring the developer to pay for the work and allowing the destruction of finite archaeological deposits, to see that it is carried out to an acceptable standard.
ten years on and still no bottom