22nd June 2009, 10:27 PM
As in a previous post some months ago I really must take issue with Dr. Wardle's assertion that only "med or earlier" is a significant finding. We can (and do) learn a great deal about the more recent (ie. post-medieval) past through watching briefs and all sorts of other archaeological activity. As award-winners on this forum can attest!
(see also for instance the most recent issue of British Archaeology).
Having said that my longest watching brief was 3 months which was, in fact, quite tedious.
(see also for instance the most recent issue of British Archaeology).
Having said that my longest watching brief was 3 months which was, in fact, quite tedious.