8th July 2009, 02:44 PM
Quote:quote:Originally posted by tom wilson
Quote:quote:Originally posted by drpeterwardle
Do you stat undertakers like gas water and electricity that operate via codes of conduct which refer to PPG 16?
You seem intent on nit-picking over semantics, which is a bit rich coming from someone who doesn't proof-read.
As you will know, not all projects are subject to the same procedures, and many procedures come with different standards, different methods and classifications for assessing importance, different terminology, and different consultees. PPG16 is not the be-all and end-all.
I could re-phrase the question in the OP, but that could cause yet more confusion, so I'll spell it out again here:
What proportion of developer-funded archaeology comes under Environmental Statements, permitted developments etc. rather than being guided solely by PPG16 under the watchful eye of the county mountie?
freeburmarangers.org
I can't answer your question, but I would point out that all the DTI consent projects I have been involved with had 'county mountie' watchful eyes on them. It's just that they were advisors to the DTI rather than to the Planning Authority.
Gas pipe lines, water pipelines, electricity, roads - I've done all of these (and more) and they were involved just as much as those projects that have gone through the Local Authority planning systems. In some cases they were more involved!
It might be worth contacting Kenny directly and asking him what his criteria are and whether he has the information you were asking about.