29th July 2009, 12:26 AM
i don't thin k so
i merely attempted to highlight perspectives which nulify each other from any decision until we broach the 'we are starting from here with a certain amount of baclogged responsibilty that requires a current standpoint' position
thats all
thats all i gotta say about that
thats as much of an opinion as anyone could get, but we do retain the responsibilty of preserving as one of our principle objectives, whilst maintaining constructive dialogues in equal measure to addressing the value of heritage assets within a heritage tourist attraction.
academic value, you cant touch or anayise
educational value, people can associate with for interactive purposes
specialist group interests, creates a foci for disruptive dialogues
preservational value, it is a rare excavated example intact (currently)
financial value, visitors ooogling
organisational value, builds up common points of interest for constructive dialogues with dispersed and unassociated interest groups and stakeholders
co-ordinational value, decision and acting together in a general concensus
anyways the list could go on...................
txt is
Mike