17th June 2004, 02:50 PM
Well, Monkey, just because someone's been to University doesn't make them any good. No-one has a right to any salary just cos they have some letters after their name. I know a number of field archaeologists with no qualifications that are infintely better diggers than new graduates. New graduates remember may have only done 3-6 weeks training digs - usually run by some bearded academic whose may have spend a few summers working in Winchester in the 1970s, but whose only subsequent experience is, er, running student training digs.
Not equipping people for the real world.
12,000 for someone with no experience is actually quite a good wage, if they do six months at 12,000 and have LEARNT something along the way then progression upwards is quite likely.
Not equipping people for the real world.
12,000 for someone with no experience is actually quite a good wage, if they do six months at 12,000 and have LEARNT something along the way then progression upwards is quite likely.