17th February 2005, 11:41 AM
I've just heard about a certain County Archaeologist that gave a very interesting talk about some henges last weekend. Apparently he spent more time explaining why the camopaign against the adjacent quarry was fundamentally flawed and filled with idiots, he ridiculed those that had signed the petition against the quarry and explained that there was very little archaeology where the quarry was planned.
This was in advance of him receiving the Archaeological Evaluation and prior to the council determining the application.
A fellow member of the Heritage Unit was spotted at the end of last year giving out leaflets on behalf of the developer.
Does this not show prejudice? I take it this sort of thing happens all the time.
This was in advance of him receiving the Archaeological Evaluation and prior to the council determining the application.
A fellow member of the Heritage Unit was spotted at the end of last year giving out leaflets on behalf of the developer.
Does this not show prejudice? I take it this sort of thing happens all the time.