5th April 2005, 10:40 AM
Chris Clarke wrote a pretty good assessment, with some added drama to make the audience sit up and take notice at:
http://www.archaeologists.net/modules/ic...ke2004.doc
There seems to have been talk in the meeting about 'benchmarking', which sounds much like the guidelines that BAJR has set, but SCAUM seem to have the upper hand on that one, pointing out the "intense competition in the sector", and that they won't jepordise commercial viability........
Same old same old....
http://www.archaeologists.net/modules/ne...?storyid=4
http://www.archaeologists.net/modules/ic...ke2004.doc
There seems to have been talk in the meeting about 'benchmarking', which sounds much like the guidelines that BAJR has set, but SCAUM seem to have the upper hand on that one, pointing out the "intense competition in the sector", and that they won't jepordise commercial viability........
Same old same old....
http://www.archaeologists.net/modules/ne...?storyid=4