21st September 2005, 07:48 PM
Thankyou Mercenary. Filling teams with inexperienced staff and in lots of cases nowadays, filling supervisory/site management teams with similar, results in hideously poor standards-ie sh*t. Why is that "pointlessly offensive"? What is pointless and offensive is that the IFA have laid down clear guidelines to ensure that ability must match the task in hand-"professionalism" if you like. If we are to simply ignore this most basic of concepts whenever we feel like it then what`s the point? The "offensive" bit for me is simply this, the IFA do not and, have not policed this guideline.The people are not sh*t, I never said that. The practise of taking on projects that require competent and experienced people (coal-face/supervisory) and then staffing them almost entirely with people who dont fit the criteria is just not on. How does an RAO justify this to the IFA and, the commercial client?