5th January 2006, 02:34 PM
Hey 1man, don't do that. Your reasoned, considered, factual, informative, and well-argued posts are invaluable in presenting the case for the IFA, so to speak, and are a major factor in preventing the forum being a bit of a one-sided rant shop. In other discussions, your contributions, with a couple of others, are the best module in CRM that a student can take - and I'm not entirely joking.
It is clear to me that much of the problem is unrealistic expectation, or unawareness of what professional institutions can do, should do and what they are for. Archaeology is a young profession - the discussions on basic contractual terminology on another thread demostrates this - and was perhaps from it's mother's womb untimely ripped, and it has a lot still to sort out. Considered, well-informed contributions are the only way to progress.
Hang on in here 1man!
We owe the dead nothing but the truth.
It is clear to me that much of the problem is unrealistic expectation, or unawareness of what professional institutions can do, should do and what they are for. Archaeology is a young profession - the discussions on basic contractual terminology on another thread demostrates this - and was perhaps from it's mother's womb untimely ripped, and it has a lot still to sort out. Considered, well-informed contributions are the only way to progress.
Hang on in here 1man!
We owe the dead nothing but the truth.