3rd November 2005, 10:27 PM
Why o why will more members make the IFA more powerful? Where is the evidence? Do they do more now than when they started, and had few members?
My personal standards are far and away higher than IFA guidlines (although I sometimes have to battle to employ them), so I have no interest in joining any organization that has standards so low.
The most important reason that I won't join though is that, at last count, some of my worst ever employers, with the worst archaeological records, are prominent in the IFA. I want no part in an organization that will happily have these individuals as members let alone influential senior members.
My personal standards are far and away higher than IFA guidlines (although I sometimes have to battle to employ them), so I have no interest in joining any organization that has standards so low.
The most important reason that I won't join though is that, at last count, some of my worst ever employers, with the worst archaeological records, are prominent in the IFA. I want no part in an organization that will happily have these individuals as members let alone influential senior members.