5th November 2005, 11:42 AM
No... these are just the views I want to hear.
I would hope that the IFA would have no control over BAJR.. it may in fact help both of us.. thus making voices stronger. It is a way of dealing with the often voiced phrase..."you can only influence the IFA from within" if it did not work.. or I felt that BAJR was in danger of being controlled.. I could of course leave. It may be worth a try... after all.. if you don't try.. you can't say one way or the other that it won't work.
I am not a MIFA or an AIFA or even a PIFA... but I will apply for MIFA status and who knows.. BAJR could become an RAO?
Another day another WSI?
I would hope that the IFA would have no control over BAJR.. it may in fact help both of us.. thus making voices stronger. It is a way of dealing with the often voiced phrase..."you can only influence the IFA from within" if it did not work.. or I felt that BAJR was in danger of being controlled.. I could of course leave. It may be worth a try... after all.. if you don't try.. you can't say one way or the other that it won't work.
I am not a MIFA or an AIFA or even a PIFA... but I will apply for MIFA status and who knows.. BAJR could become an RAO?
Another day another WSI?