16th November 2005, 07:57 PM
In the context of the minutes the statements on significance appear to refer to the archaeology in the whole development area not just the trenches. From what I can gather the remains in the additional evaluation appear to be the only sort of archaeology on the site (correct me if I am wrong). Unfortunately I wasn't there so I dont know exactly what was said but it sounds to me that they are refering to the whole area.
G
[/quote]
By "site" you presumably mean the whole area under application. The decision on that is presumably still up in the air, otherwise why do the evaluation? The only preservation in-situ decision made so far appears to be regarding the archaeology in the trenches. A VERY different thing indeed.
[/quote]
G
[/quote]
By "site" you presumably mean the whole area under application. The decision on that is presumably still up in the air, otherwise why do the evaluation? The only preservation in-situ decision made so far appears to be regarding the archaeology in the trenches. A VERY different thing indeed.
[/quote]