18th November 2005, 12:35 AM
1man1desk.
Interesting that those scales and benefits are due for 2007. They ignore the reccommendations of APPAG. They maintain the status Quo and are nothing new.Not only that, if we look really closely, we may just find that some of these new "action-not words" are nothing more than following current statutory requirements in employment law.The pay scales across the board are pathetic, offensive,derisory and I`m sorry-you`ve just provided me with probably the best anti-IFA example possible.Further, if the IFA have no role in ppg-land, who are they to determine wage levels for the mass of us who work in that environment? Once again-we have been undervalued.My main thrust in all I say is nothing to do with pay.Although pay and conditions in the industry can still be seen as appalling-standards in the field and elsewhere is my gripe. As I said before, nothing tangible.
Interesting that those scales and benefits are due for 2007. They ignore the reccommendations of APPAG. They maintain the status Quo and are nothing new.Not only that, if we look really closely, we may just find that some of these new "action-not words" are nothing more than following current statutory requirements in employment law.The pay scales across the board are pathetic, offensive,derisory and I`m sorry-you`ve just provided me with probably the best anti-IFA example possible.Further, if the IFA have no role in ppg-land, who are they to determine wage levels for the mass of us who work in that environment? Once again-we have been undervalued.My main thrust in all I say is nothing to do with pay.Although pay and conditions in the industry can still be seen as appalling-standards in the field and elsewhere is my gripe. As I said before, nothing tangible.