4th December 2005, 02:43 PM
There seems to be clear evidence that this individual has breached at least two sections of the IFA code of conduct. This applies to all members of the IFA regardless of their grade of membership (or how easy it is to achieve such accreditation). Namely his comments about not employing trade union members seem to infringe the following:
And:
I am not sure how what I and others say can prejudice an IFA enquiry. Just as the IFA is not a policeman, it is not a court of law.
The sanctions available to the IFA if they discover a breach of their code are to reprimand, suspend or expel the individual. Presumably their choice will indicate how seriously they regard this apparent breach of their own rules and employment law.
I don't expect swift action by the IFA, but it would be nice if any of the IFA members out there could keep us informed of any developments...
Quote:quote:5.1 An archaeologist shall give due regard to the requirements of employment legislation relating to employees, colleagues or helpersIf things are still the same from my time as a union rep, discrimination on grounds of union membership is regarded in law as seriously as discrimination on grounds of sex and race. The individual discriminated against would be entitled to an unlimited pay out if an industrial tribunal found in their favour.
And:
Quote:quote:5.7 An archaeologist shall have due regard to the rights of individuals who wish to join or belong to a trade union, professional or trade association.
I am not sure how what I and others say can prejudice an IFA enquiry. Just as the IFA is not a policeman, it is not a court of law.
The sanctions available to the IFA if they discover a breach of their code are to reprimand, suspend or expel the individual. Presumably their choice will indicate how seriously they regard this apparent breach of their own rules and employment law.
I don't expect swift action by the IFA, but it would be nice if any of the IFA members out there could keep us informed of any developments...