4th December 2005, 11:11 PM
Quote:quote:Originally posted by ReggieDo we really have enough scientific evidence to say that a site is safe for a man to work on but not a woman? I say this bearing in mind that it is generally accepted that women tend to be more body aware than men, visit the doctors more frequently for checkups/family planning etc. It may well be that that has not been sufficient research or documentation of male reactions to contaminants to say there is or isn't a risk.
Well made points, Reggie.
It does seem on re-reading the regulation that men would probably find it more difficult to appreciate all of the elements inherent in this risk assessment. I guess that one hopes a male archaeologist carrying out an assessment of this nature would consult with the women concerned.........!!
Again bearing that thought in mind, perhaps holding ones breath isn't a good idea....
