28th December 2005, 01:28 PM
No argument there. National/regional/county/local curatorial organisations are all publicly funded and therefore publicly accountable (through their elected political masters). Trouble is, the elected political masters often have other priorities that sometimes conflict with the interests of archaeological preservation, so the public accountability sometimes (not always) pushes in the opposite direction that we would want it to, especially when it comes to planning decisions on Council-proposed developments.
1man1desk
to let, fully furnished
1man1desk
to let, fully furnished