9th January 2006, 03:14 PM
I'd like to rephrase my second comment "The RCHME should be reformed if EH is going to continue to be turned into a government body so that monument surveys etc can become more plentiful to assist in the monitoring of the survival of them." as it is based on personal ill-feelings.
It may read better as:
Reformation of the RCHME to provide the sector with a body that can dedicate itself to the monitoring and surveying of monuments. EH could then dedicate itself to the formation of policy and providing guidance.
If anyone feels that this could be improved then feel free to re-write (in your own post ).
When I look at the smiles on all the children's faces, I just know they're about to jab me with something.
It may read better as:
Reformation of the RCHME to provide the sector with a body that can dedicate itself to the monitoring and surveying of monuments. EH could then dedicate itself to the formation of policy and providing guidance.
If anyone feels that this could be improved then feel free to re-write (in your own post ).
When I look at the smiles on all the children's faces, I just know they're about to jab me with something.