16th January 2006, 02:44 PM
Good positive response IMHO. Using the same numeration:
1. Standards in the general sense are of course provied by the IFA. Are you referring to a more specicic set of standards? (hold this end of trowel...) and how universal, i.e non-site specific, could they be?
2. I understand that this would be illegal in Europe?
3. I would consider myself duty bound to report transgessions anyway, as an IFA member and as my professional duty, if I was one. (CV available on request
).
4. I find this remarkable, frankly. What standards are referred to then? Are they higher than IFA's? Monitoring and resourcing by the curtaors is the key, I would opine.
5 and 6 - yep.
We owe the dead nothing but the truth.
1. Standards in the general sense are of course provied by the IFA. Are you referring to a more specicic set of standards? (hold this end of trowel...) and how universal, i.e non-site specific, could they be?
2. I understand that this would be illegal in Europe?
3. I would consider myself duty bound to report transgessions anyway, as an IFA member and as my professional duty, if I was one. (CV available on request
).4. I find this remarkable, frankly. What standards are referred to then? Are they higher than IFA's? Monitoring and resourcing by the curtaors is the key, I would opine.
5 and 6 - yep.
We owe the dead nothing but the truth.