22nd January 2006, 09:13 PM
Not too sure about this one.I think we have enough on our plate with the current state of play (Thornborough/ppg 16/ appalling standards/ ineffective Institute/ competative tendering of the nations heritage etc).Please don`t shout at me but, here goes..."real" archaeology is shafted at every turn in this wonderful country of ours as it is and I`m wondering if we should`nt be dealing with that before prioritising the recent past.Isn`t "contemporary archaeology" the realm of the pure social sciences anyway?
Good to hear from you Paul-no offence meant, I`m trying to be provocative.....
..knowledge without action is insanity and action without knowledge is vanity..(imam ghazali,ayyuhal-walad)
Good to hear from you Paul-no offence meant, I`m trying to be provocative.....
..knowledge without action is insanity and action without knowledge is vanity..(imam ghazali,ayyuhal-walad)