3rd February 2006, 01:29 PM
Just as long as rumours are not passed off as fact... and comments about people who are doing a good job are kept relevant.
accusing Neil of being ...
an officer who favours "excavate and destroy" developer-funded archaeology and was recruited by the man who is now Tarmac?s consultant archaeologist?
is not helping the justifiable cause of preventing quarrying around the henges... and to publically say that Mike Heyworth was barred from site when he was not etc etc.
This is not tough this is just sensible. Stick to facts and don't blame the messengers. The Daily Diary was a brilliant piece of social history and showed what we have to put up with...
BAJR Host supports the campaign but deplores the misinformation
Another day another WSI?
accusing Neil of being ...
an officer who favours "excavate and destroy" developer-funded archaeology and was recruited by the man who is now Tarmac?s consultant archaeologist?
is not helping the justifiable cause of preventing quarrying around the henges... and to publically say that Mike Heyworth was barred from site when he was not etc etc.
This is not tough this is just sensible. Stick to facts and don't blame the messengers. The Daily Diary was a brilliant piece of social history and showed what we have to put up with...
BAJR Host supports the campaign but deplores the misinformation
Another day another WSI?