21st February 2006, 12:04 AM
Going back to the publication of grey lit on Oasis
Oasis, while not being perfect, shouldnt just be used for including the 'good' reports. As a rule my unit creates an oasis reference, and attaches a .pdf report for every single funded project (even when its just a case of 'looked in hole, saw bugger all' - which seems to be my luck recently).
Why do we do this? Its in the curatorial brief and spec and as a result all our work is open to public scrutiny, not just the curator.
Quote:quote:Yeah, but these schemes allow access to the good reports. What I'd like is the public getting access to the really shameful ones.
Oasis, while not being perfect, shouldnt just be used for including the 'good' reports. As a rule my unit creates an oasis reference, and attaches a .pdf report for every single funded project (even when its just a case of 'looked in hole, saw bugger all' - which seems to be my luck recently).
Why do we do this? Its in the curatorial brief and spec and as a result all our work is open to public scrutiny, not just the curator.