1st March 2006, 11:25 AM
Quote:quote:Originally posted by Venutius
So your argument is this: So long as the developer can show the archaeology is being damaged, then a development should be allowed to go ahead regardless of its importance.
Save the Thornborough Henge Complex - http://www.timewatch.org
As I see it, outside the development process - knowing that the archaeology on the site is going to be destroyed what are you going to do about it?