1st March 2006, 11:30 PM
Venutius.
I think you perhaps are assuming something about me because it is apparent that I?m an archaeologist who has worked at the Henges.
Is it possible that you have pigeonholed me and assumed that I have such opinions because you view me as the enemy?
If so, it is interesting to be a victim of such prejudice.
Where in any of my postings did I argue or suggest,
?that So long as the developer can show the archaeology is being damaged, then a development should be allowed to go ahead regardless of its importance??
Once you have re-read my postings. I await your reply.
Arthus
I think you perhaps are assuming something about me because it is apparent that I?m an archaeologist who has worked at the Henges.
Is it possible that you have pigeonholed me and assumed that I have such opinions because you view me as the enemy?
If so, it is interesting to be a victim of such prejudice.
Where in any of my postings did I argue or suggest,
?that So long as the developer can show the archaeology is being damaged, then a development should be allowed to go ahead regardless of its importance??
Once you have re-read my postings. I await your reply.
Arthus