2nd March 2006, 02:41 PM
Quote:quote:Originally posted by Arthus
I think you perhaps are assuming something about me because it is apparent that I?m an archaeologist who has worked at the Henges.
Where in any of my postings did I argue or suggest,
?that So long as the developer can show the archaeology is being damaged, then a development should be allowed to go ahead regardless of its importance??
Once you have re-read my postings. I await your reply.
Arthus
I, for one, never make assumptions about people. If you are an archaeologist who worked on the quarry/possible quarry then I believe you were doing what you were paid to do, nothing more.
As for your previous posting, try reading point 5 again:
"any chance to excavate as much of the archaeology in the area surrounding the Henges should be taken now"
do I need to elaborate?
Point 6 in that post also makes me ask if you are keeping abreast of latest proposals for tourism around the henges. If so, what are you going to do about it?
P