6th March 2006, 01:41 PM
It occurs to me also that the higher you rise in archaeology (does anyone earn ?28,000+ by the way?), the more likely it is that your institution will pay for you to be a member of a 'professional institute'. That makes their income related scale even more unfair since us poor sods at the sharp end usually pay our own fees (not that I'm a member).
They will no doubt defend themselves by saying that comparable institutions for architects etc charge comparable fees, but there are some important respects in which we are not comparable!
Out of interest, did you feel that you got anything (on a personal level) out of your membership when you were one?
They will no doubt defend themselves by saying that comparable institutions for architects etc charge comparable fees, but there are some important respects in which we are not comparable!
Out of interest, did you feel that you got anything (on a personal level) out of your membership when you were one?