7th March 2006, 11:29 AM
OK guys I apologize sincerely for causing you any offense. I have even edited two mentions of the individual's name you missed !
However, these comments are not libellous, they are objectively critical and there's a big difference between the two, as David Irving would agree if he had access to the internet right now.
If they were ever to be pursued in a law court here or in the UK, the plaintiff would have to prove he had been libelled.
He has been critized, in the opinion of a legal friend, quite rightly so. Reading back thro the posts, I am certainly not the first to question this individual's professional competence.
However, these comments are not libellous, they are objectively critical and there's a big difference between the two, as David Irving would agree if he had access to the internet right now.
If they were ever to be pursued in a law court here or in the UK, the plaintiff would have to prove he had been libelled.
He has been critized, in the opinion of a legal friend, quite rightly so. Reading back thro the posts, I am certainly not the first to question this individual's professional competence.