12th April 2006, 09:29 AM
After the cut and thrust of pushing forward the potential of a Dignity wage starting point by April 2007 - I am in a position to agree that you never underestimate the new (BAJR was once the angry young man)
Natalie should however temper her posts with slightly less patronising tones, and although I wish her business well, I have yet to have one piece of hard fact to lay against Archpeople- only business speak rhetoric.
Some of our skeptic natures come from years of work in archaeology.
If archpeople have something real to offer, ( I look forward with hope to the website working as promised) then they should just get on and do it. If it works....... great. People can make there own minds up, and as there will be no financial commitment, what can you lose.?
And don't worry - It is not a choice between BAJR and Archpeople it never will be - BAJR offers a very different service.
Another day another WSI?
Natalie should however temper her posts with slightly less patronising tones, and although I wish her business well, I have yet to have one piece of hard fact to lay against Archpeople- only business speak rhetoric.
Some of our skeptic natures come from years of work in archaeology.
If archpeople have something real to offer, ( I look forward with hope to the website working as promised) then they should just get on and do it. If it works....... great. People can make there own minds up, and as there will be no financial commitment, what can you lose.?
And don't worry - It is not a choice between BAJR and Archpeople it never will be - BAJR offers a very different service.
Another day another WSI?