27th April 2006, 03:36 PM
Invisble wrote
'There is no direct contractual link between the employer and the "actual" contractor.'
Exactly - and that has been the issue that I have been looking to explore all along here. The ICE Contract does not appear to be applicable in situations where the archaeological contractor is not directly employed by the developer - or is it ?
Beamo
'There is no direct contractual link between the employer and the "actual" contractor.'
Exactly - and that has been the issue that I have been looking to explore all along here. The ICE Contract does not appear to be applicable in situations where the archaeological contractor is not directly employed by the developer - or is it ?
Beamo