28th April 2006, 02:15 PM
It would be the consultant who did it (equivalent role to the architect assisted by the QS)). The curator would look at it in broad terms but the consultan would be doing it as part of a valuation, as well as in pure quality terms.
Of course it works the other way too, which was my main point. The contractor would get paid for all work done thus removing the risk element.
We owe the dead nothing but the truth.
Of course it works the other way too, which was my main point. The contractor would get paid for all work done thus removing the risk element.
We owe the dead nothing but the truth.