4th May 2006, 08:59 PM
Again, you have avoided my particular questions - recruiting your co-moderator for support.
The issues i was concerned about were as follows (and viewed from over a wall):
1) no accomadation for staff
2) no washing facilities
3) shared toilet facilities with demolition contractors despite there being a woman on the archaeological site
4) no adequate screening of the site according to HO licence
and all in the depths of winter !!!!!
Guardian of archaeology step forward PLEASE!!!!
The issues i was concerned about were as follows (and viewed from over a wall):
1) no accomadation for staff
2) no washing facilities
3) shared toilet facilities with demolition contractors despite there being a woman on the archaeological site
4) no adequate screening of the site according to HO licence
and all in the depths of winter !!!!!
Guardian of archaeology step forward PLEASE!!!!
Quote:quote:Originally posted by BAJR Host
Sad buttrue in many cases Troll... sad but true...
However... the more people and Units who agree to abide by specific rules... then the better... WIth other transgresions which are clear breaches of H&S or Employment Law.. its easier...
ie... if you do not have 'access to' toilet facilities then that is a Breach... whether or not you are in the IFA or Not...
But as ever... evidence is always required. Good strong evidence that illustrates the complaint.
Another day another WSI?